Szpunar in C- 263/18: tra e-commerce e diritto d’autore

CONCLUSIONI DELL’AVVOCATO GENERALE MACIEJ SZPUNAR presentate il 10 settembre 2019 (1) Causa C-263/18 Nederlands Uitgeversverbond, Groep Algemene Uitgevers contro Tom Kabinet Internet BV, Tom Kabinet Holding BV, Tom Kabinet Uitgeverij BV [domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale, proposta dal rechtbank Den Haag (Tribunale dell’Aia, Paesi Bassi)]   «Direttiva 2001/29/CE – Società dell’informazione – Armonizzazione di taluni aspetti del diritto d’autore…

Right to be forgotten and delisting: Advocate General Szpunar proposes that the Court should hold that the operator of a search engine must, as a matter of course, accede to a request for the de-referencing of sensitive data. The operator of a search engine must, however, ensure protection of the right of access to information and of the right of freedom of expression (Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-136/17)

Advocate General Szpunar proposes that the Court should hold that the operator of a search engine must, as a matter of course, accede to a request for the de-referencing of sensitive data The operator of a search engine must, however, ensure protection of the right of access to information and of the right of freedom…

Advocate General Szpunar proposes that the Court should limit the scope of the de- referencing that search engine operators are required to carry out to the EU – L’avvocato generale Szpunar propone alla Corte di limitare all’ambito dell’Unione europea la deindicizzazione alla quale devono procedere i gestori di motori di ricerca (Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale nella causa C-507/17 Google / CNIL)

Con decisione del 21 maggio 2015, la presidente della Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (Francia) (Commissione nazionale per l’informatica e le libertà, in prosieguo: la «CNIL») ha diffidato Google ad applicare, allorché accoglie una richiesta di una persona fisica diretta a far eliminare i link verso pagine Internet dall’elenco dei risultati visualizzato in…

Buttarelli: The urgent case for a new ePrivacy law

A swarm of misinformation and misunderstanding surrounds the case for revising our rules on the confidentiality of electronic communications, otherwise known as ePrivacy. It’s high time for some honest debunking. We are now at the business end of the 2014-2019 term of office for MEPs and the current College of European Commissioners. The European Parliament…

Free flow of non-personal data: Parliament approves EU’s fifth freedom

New rules aimed at removing obstacles to the free movement of non-personal data within the EU for companies and public authorities were adopted by MEPs. This EU law, already provisionally agreed with the Council, will prohibit national rules requiring that data be stored or processed in a specific member state. Non-personal data includes, for instance,…